Carle The law was passed on September 28. It contains a provision that would require municipalities to fund public schools and private childcare from other municipalities. It is an aggravation of the Debre law that limited the obligation of municipalities to schools located within their territory. Only count the choice of the family; Mayors have no opinion to make, they will pay only.
Law Debre met, somehow, the idea of public service education. Carle with the law, we propose a business relationship between the user and the school. The new law take precedence over commercial logic on the logic of public service, interest on interest.
Law Carle is a step toward a free education market with the award of some kind of voucher education, education vouchers cheapest National Front.
Law Carle entered into positive law, for the first time, a financing obligation related to "academic freedom", which seems to be compatible with the Constitution. Another aspect particularly questionable: "parity" between public and private education. But here it is: the appeals before the Constitutional Council were unsuccessful.
It will increase enrollment in private schools, it will finance competition unnecessary and harmful between public and private education. As stated
Muriel Fitoussi and Eddy KHALDI (Hands Over Public School, Demopolis, 2008): "Nanterre Neuilly pay for! The suburb will pay for the city, rural communes will be penalized with a high risk of school exodus.
Law Carle will increase spending on education of Commons. Except in municipalities where not to invest in a school building, because there is no guarantee that attendance will be at the rendezvous!
Unless municipalities and local authorities refuse to fund discretionary spending institutions private.
0 comments:
Post a Comment