Coversyl 4mg Can Cause Cancser?

Law was passed: it foreshadows the check-High School Education

Carle The law was passed on September 28. It contains a provision that would require municipalities to fund public schools and private childcare from other municipalities. It is an aggravation of the Debre law that limited the obligation of municipalities to schools located within their territory. Only count the choice of the family; Mayors have no opinion to make, they will pay only.

Law Debre met, somehow, the idea of public service education. Carle with the law, we propose a business relationship between the user and the school. The new law take precedence over commercial logic on the logic of public service, interest on interest.

Law Carle is a step toward a free education market with the award of some kind of voucher education, education vouchers cheapest National Front.

Law Carle entered into positive law, for the first time, a financing obligation related to "academic freedom", which seems to be compatible with the Constitution. Another aspect particularly questionable: "parity" between public and private education. But here it is: the appeals before the Constitutional Council were unsuccessful.

It will increase enrollment in private schools, it will finance competition unnecessary and harmful between public and private education. As stated
Muriel Fitoussi and Eddy KHALDI (Hands Over Public School, Demopolis, 2008): "Nanterre Neuilly pay for! The suburb will pay for the city, rural communes will be penalized with a high risk of school exodus.

Law Carle will increase spending on education of Commons. Except in municipalities where not to invest in a school building, because there is no guarantee that attendance will be at the rendezvous!
Unless municipalities and local authorities refuse to fund discretionary spending institutions private.

Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 In Toddler Images

between democracy and elitism

In presenting the creation of high schools in 1802 as an act signifying "the end of the privileges of birth" the President of the Republic does not report that part of the historical reality. Recall the context and some other no less significant.

The law of 11 Floreal An X closes the debate opened in 1789 to find the best way to ensure the education of future citizens and education of the nation, according to the vocabulary of the time. Bonaparte's rule this debate ignoring the education of and by decreeing that the role of the Nation is to train professionals Nation, and soon the Empire.

The idea is not fundamentally challenged by the Restoration, or by the following schemes, since primary education which is under the July Monarchy will grow (and with what success after Jules Ferry) completely separate secondary education. It was not until the Popular Front for the timid comparisons made on the ground are moving towards the "unique school" claimed for several years. But the concrete traces of the triple sector (primary, secondary, technical education) remain until the beginning of the Vth Republic and may explain the resistance of the institution to become a high school for all! If

School today boasts democratic intentions that have given rise, it remains as traces of targets elite school of Napoleon. Saying that the school is a prisoner would make him a bad case, but give only the qualities of democracy-these intentions is also illusory.

In fact, the school today is torn between several temptations: broadcasting space to the largest number of classical culture, big step to access schools, venue of teaching "secondary" (but this notion is hardly understood by professionals in education), instead of cramming (that is to say, systematic training in passing the baccalaureate), siding to complete his teens ... These ambivalences are permanent sources of misunderstanding among students.

More alarming is the high school portion required for graduation flagship, the pan, it becomes the model and / or purpose of all levels of education: college, elementary school or kindergarten and higher education, which is a way of denying The specificity of each of these points of education, which interferes with understanding by the public. Reforms can provide technical solutions to overcome this situation, especially if it is of fundamental reforms rather than marginal retouch. But only a real public debate, will reach agreement on the function of the school in the Republic.